WHAT ARE SUPPORTS?

The concept of supports originated about 15 years ago and it has revolutionized the way habilitation and education services are provided to persons with mental retardation. Rather than mold individuals in to pre-existing diagnostic categories and force them into existing models of service, the supports approach evaluates the specific needs of the individual and then suggests strategies, services and supports that will optimize individual functioning. The supports approach also recognizes that individual needs and circumstances will change over time. Supports were an innovative aspect of the 1992 AAMR manual and they remain critical in the 2002 system. In 2002, they have been dramatically expanded and improved to reflect significant progress over the last decade.

Supports are defined as the resources and individual strategies necessary to promote the development, education, interests and personal well being of a person with mental retardation. Supports can be provided by a parent, friend, teacher, psychologist, doctor or by any appropriate person or agency.

Why are supports important?

Providing individualized supports can improve personal functioning, promote self-determination and societal inclusion, and improve personal well-being of a person with mental retardation. Focusing on supports as the way to improve education, employment, recreation and living environments is an important part of person-centered approaches to providing supports to people with mental retardation.

How do you determine what supports are needed?

AAMR recommends that an individual’s need for supports be analyzed in at least nine key areas such as human development, teaching and education, home living, community living, employment, health and safety, behavior, social and protection and advocacy.

What are some specific examples of supports areas and support activities?

Human Development Activities

• Providing physical development opportunities that include eye-hand coordination, fine motor skills and gross motor activities
• Providing cognitive development opportunities such as using words and images to represent the world and reasoning logically about concrete events
• Providing social and emotional developmental activities to foster trust, autonomy and initiative

Teaching and Education Activities

• Interacting with trainers and teachers and fellow trainee and students
• Participating in making decisions on training and educational activities
• Learning and using problem-solving strategies
• Using technology for learning
• Learning and using functional academics (reading signs, counting change, etc.)
• Learning and using self-determination skills

Home Living Activities

• Using the restroom/toilet
• Laundering and taking care of clothes
• Preparing and eating food
• Housekeeping and cleaning
• Dressing
• Bathing and taking care of personal hygiene and grooming needs
• Operating home appliances and technology
• Participating in leisure activities with the home

Community Living Activities

• Using transportation
• Participating in recreation and leisure activities
• Going to visit friends and family
• Shopping and purchasing goods
• Interacting with community members
• Using public buildings and settings

Employment Activities

• Learning and using specific job skills
• Interacting with co-workers
• Interacting with supervisors
• Completing work related tasks with speed and quality
• Changing job assignments
• Accessing and obtaining crisis intervention and assistance

Health and Safety Activities

• Accessing and obtaining therapy services
• Taking medication
• Avoiding health and safety hazards
• Communicating with health care providers
• Accessing emergency services
• Maintaining a nutritious diet
• Maintaining physical health
• Maintaining mental health/emotional well-being

Behavioral Activities

• Learning specific skills or behaviors
• Learning and making appropriate decisions
• Accessing and obtaining mental health treatments
• Accessing and obtaining substance abuse treatments
• Incorporating personal preferences into daily activities
• Maintaining socially appropriate behavior in public
• Controlling anger and aggression

Social Activities

• Socializing within the family
• Participating in recreation and leisure activities
• Making appropriate sexual decisions
• Socializing outside the family
• Making and keeping friends
• Communicating with others about personal needs
• Engaging in loving and intimate relationships
• Offering assistance and assisting others

Protection and Advocacy

• Advocating for self and others
• Managing money and personal finances
• Protecting self from exploitation
• Exercising legal rights and responsibilities
• Belonging to and participating in self-advocacy/support organizations
• Obtaining legal services

MENTAL RETARDATION AND CRIME

The vast majority of people with mental retardation never break the law. Nevertheless, mentally retarded people may be disproportionately represented in America’s persons. Although people with mental retardation constitute somewhere between 2.5 and 3 percent of U.S. population, experts estimate they may constitute between 2 and 10 percent of the prison population. The disproportionate number of persons with mental retardation in the incarcerated population most likely reflects the fact that people with this impairment who break the law are more likely to be caught, more likely to confess and be convicted, and less likely to be paroled. It may also be that some of the people with mental retardation who are serving the prison sentences are innocent, but they confessed to crimes they did not commit because of their characteristic suggestibility and desire to please authority figures. See Section IV below.

As with people of normal intelligence, many factors can prompt people with mental retardation to commit crimes, including unique personal experiences, poverty, environmental influences and individual characteristics. Attributes common to mental retardation may, in particular cases, also contribute to criminal behavior. The very vulnerabilities that cause problems for people with mental retardation in the most routine daily interactions can, at times, lead to tragic violence.

Many people with mental retardation are picked upon, victimized and humiliated because of their disability. The desire for approval and acceptance and the need for protection can lead a person with mental retardation to do whatever others tell him. People with mental retardation can fall prey when people with greater intelligence decide to take advantage of them, and they become the unwitting tools of others. Many of the cases in which people with mental retardation have committed murder involved other participants—who did not have mental retardation—and/or occurred in the context of crimes, often robberies, that were planned or instigated by other people. As one expert in mental retardation has noted, “Most people with mental retardation don’t act alone. They are usually dependent. They are never the ringleader or the leader of gang.”

“Joe, a mentally retarded man, admired tough-talking local drug dealers and sought to befriend them. One day his drug dealer “friends” gave Joe a gun and instructed him to go into a store and take money from the clerk. They told him, however, “Don’t shoot the guy unless you have to. “Joe hid for while, and then entered the store, but he forgot his instructions. “He panicked and couldn’t remember the plan. He shot the guy and forgot to rob the store.”

Billy Dwayne White, a teenager with mental retardation, allied himself with older men in the neighborhood, one of whom testified: “When Billy started hanging around us he was real scared and timed. We told him that he would have to change. We taught him how to steal. We would get him to do things that were wrong by telling him that he was a coward if he didn’t and that he could only be in our gang if he showed us that he had courage…we could persuade him to do these things because he was easily misled.

People with mental retardation may also engage in criminal behavior because of their characteristically poor impulse control, difficulty with long-term thinking, and difficulty handling stressful and emotionally fraught situations. They may not be able to predict the consequences of their acts or resist a strong emotional response. The homicides committed by the people with mental retardation acting alone are almost without exception unplanned, spur of the moment acts of violence in the context of panic, fear, or anger, often committed when another crime, such as a robbery, went wrong. For example, William Smith, I.Q. 65, tried to take money from “old Dan,” a friendly elderly storekeeper he had known all his life. When Dan resisted, smith panicked and lashed out, killing him.

Low intellectual skills and limited planning capacities mean that people who have mental retardation are more likely than people of normal intelligence to get caught if they commit crimes. As a result, they make goof “fall guys” for more sophisticated criminals. A suspect with mental retardation is also less likely to know how to avoid incriminating himself, hire a lawyer and negotiate a plea.