Mental Retardation in America: A Historical Reader_III

(Part-III)

A problem in reading the various chapters of this book, which is also true of working with mental retardation in the real world, is the wide range of persons who are classified as mentally retarded. This is illustrated at one extreme by the vignettes of formerly institutionalized young men inducted into the armed services during World War II, who, in many instances, served effectively. In that time of great social need, it was these soldiers’ abilities, not their disabilities that counted. At the other extreme, in my work I encounter youngsters whose mental retardation is insignificant as compared with their severe disorders of behaviors. Finally, it is the behavioral disorder and not intellectual retardation that is decisive and destructive to family life. This suggests a fundamental flaw in the concept of mental retardation: “mental” life constitutes not only intellectual ability (as measured by IQ tests), but also attributes that are emotional and moral (for lack of a better word) as well. The overvaluation of IQ seems to be leading to decisions regarding capital punishment. The underestimation of emotional and behavioral dyscontrol and the systematic abolition of residential placement for children still give rise to situations as burdensome and cruel for families as any described in this book.

Mental Retardation in America tells a story with a broad sweep—how a society has dealt with mental retardation through profound social and scientific changes. At this end, we are in many respects back where we started, with retarded children cared for within their families. The plot is powerful, the questions profound, and the answers that have been given over the years show the usual flaws and faults of most human endeavors.

Mental Retardation in America: A Historical Reader_II

(Part-II)

The second equally influential study was The Kalliakak Family; A Study in the Heredity of Feeble Mindedness by Henry Goddard, 1912. Inspired by the new Mendelism, the study traced back six generations of the family of a young institutionalized woman and found an appalling amount of defectiveness. Yet there was also information about “a good family of the same name.” it emerged, of course, that the forebear met “a feeble-minded girl by whom he became the father of a feeble-minded son.”  Subsequently the father “married a respectable girl of good family, “by whom he produced children with “a marked tendency toward professional careers,” who had “married into the best families. . . . Signers of the declaration of independence ….etc.” Goddard invented the pseudonym kallikak by combining a Greek root meaning “beauty” (kallos) with one meaning “bad” (kakos). The lesson was clear and dramatic: the study linked medical and moral deviance and fused the new Mendelian laws with the old biblical injunction that “the sins of the fathers shall be visited on the sons”

These ideas fueled the eugenics movement and the campaign for sterilization of the mentally retarded, which, according to the editors, was “the nadir of the American experience with mental retardation.” The Supreme Court upheld eugenic sterilization in 1927, with Oliver Wendell Holmes’s pronouncement that “three generations of imbeciles is enough.” After World War II and the revelation of Nazi experience with eugenics, support for sterilization faded. The sterilization issue inspired writers—especially Steinbeck and Faulkner—to explore the lives of mentally, retarded characters in works that are sensitively reviewed in this book.

After World War II, and with the ensuing general prosperity, the activism of parents on the behalf of their physically and mentally handicapped children arose; such activism was inspired by a new belief in human rights after the Nazi atrocities and by the “intense middle-class familialism” of the postwar years. This attitude led to a desire that retarded children be a part of their families and receive the same degree of care and concern—and ultimately the same services, including education—as “normal children.” Deinstitutionalization followed, and in 1975 Congress enacted a guarantee of free public education to children with disabilities by passing the Education for All handicapped Children Act. The special role of President John F. Kennedy, his sister Eunice Kennedy Shriver, and the rest of the Kennedy family in supporting services—including the Special Olympics, an important example of the “ideology of normalization”—and advocating for the mentally retarded persons should be noted. Further steps were taken to bring persons with mental retardation under the equal protection of the laws as American citizens; these measures included the ruling that people should be served in the least restrictive environment and the decisions that established the community as the site of services for people with mental retardation and disallowed that condition as the sole justification for institutionalization. 

Mental Retardation in America: A Historical Reader_I

(Part-I)

This is highly readable and well-edited historical anthology, a wide-ranging collection that deals with mental retardation over two centuries. The focus is on the views and actions of society. The book deserves perusal by anyone interested in mental retardation.

            The editor consider the history of retardation in the context of general history of the recognition of “Mongolism” by John Landon Down, the racial detour that accompanied that recognition, and eventual delineation of trisomy 21 as the cause; the other is a treatise on the pathology of mental retardation by Dr. William Fish, of the Albany Medical College, which he wrote in 1879. The treatise is welcome fare for a physician reader. Discussed are consanguine marriages, abnormalities of the “minute structure of the brain,” microcephaly, epilepsy, and cretinism in Switzerland (…the precise element or elements producing it have not as yet been determined”), hydrocephaly, trauma and paralysis. Equally clear is Dr. Fish’s prescription, “The necessity for training schools and asylums for the reception of the idiotic and imbecile is now unquestioned….[Its is] the duty of society to provide for these feeble ones… An idiot child in the family of a laboring man is a burden weighing heavily upon him and may indirectly by the means of rendering the whole family dependent on the state for support.”

This rather straightforward approach contrasts with the complexity of the history of mental retardation in American society, which is reflective of the larger course of events in American society. The full sweep of that history is outlined from retarded persons functioning as integral parts of their families in the Colonial and early rural United Stats to the almshouses of the late 18^th and early 19^th centuries, where the poor, infirm, insane and idiotic were conflated in conditions of indescribable depravity. Later came the specialization of institution for epileptics and the retarded. The pressures of urbanization and industrialization the needs of immigrant families and the application of scientific concepts to the definition of retardation, e.g., the advent of intelligence tests and the familiar categorization of the retarded as idiots, imbeciles and morons) led to the heyday of institutionalization. Between 1870 and 1880, there was a fivefold increase in the number of feeble-minded people.

Social forces and scientific interest led to intense focus on and very convoluted thinking about the retarded. The 19^th century view of degeneracy (roughly synonymous with bad heredity) led theorists to conceive of social problems such as insanity, poverty, intemperance and criminality as well as idiocy as interchangeable. This view was expounded in “The Jukes” A Study Crime, pauperism Disease and heredity by Richard Dugdale, 1875, a study of a rural clan that over seven generations produced 1200 bastards, beggars, murderers, prostitutes, thieves and syphilitics. 

MENTAL RETARDATION AND CRIME

The vast majority of people with mental retardation never break the law. Nevertheless, mentally retarded people may be disproportionately represented in America’s persons. Although people with mental retardation constitute somewhere between 2.5 and 3 percent of U.S. population, experts estimate they may constitute between 2 and 10 percent of the prison population. The disproportionate number of persons with mental retardation in the incarcerated population most likely reflects the fact that people with this impairment who break the law are more likely to be caught, more likely to confess and be convicted, and less likely to be paroled. It may also be that some of the people with mental retardation who are serving the prison sentences are innocent, but they confessed to crimes they did not commit because of their characteristic suggestibility and desire to please authority figures. See Section IV below.

As with people of normal intelligence, many factors can prompt people with mental retardation to commit crimes, including unique personal experiences, poverty, environmental influences and individual characteristics. Attributes common to mental retardation may, in particular cases, also contribute to criminal behavior. The very vulnerabilities that cause problems for people with mental retardation in the most routine daily interactions can, at times, lead to tragic violence.

Many people with mental retardation are picked upon, victimized and humiliated because of their disability. The desire for approval and acceptance and the need for protection can lead a person with mental retardation to do whatever others tell him. People with mental retardation can fall prey when people with greater intelligence decide to take advantage of them, and they become the unwitting tools of others. Many of the cases in which people with mental retardation have committed murder involved other participants—who did not have mental retardation—and/or occurred in the context of crimes, often robberies, that were planned or instigated by other people. As one expert in mental retardation has noted, “Most people with mental retardation don’t act alone. They are usually dependent. They are never the ringleader or the leader of gang.”

“Joe, a mentally retarded man, admired tough-talking local drug dealers and sought to befriend them. One day his drug dealer “friends” gave Joe a gun and instructed him to go into a store and take money from the clerk. They told him, however, “Don’t shoot the guy unless you have to. “Joe hid for while, and then entered the store, but he forgot his instructions. “He panicked and couldn’t remember the plan. He shot the guy and forgot to rob the store.”

Billy Dwayne White, a teenager with mental retardation, allied himself with older men in the neighborhood, one of whom testified: “When Billy started hanging around us he was real scared and timed. We told him that he would have to change. We taught him how to steal. We would get him to do things that were wrong by telling him that he was a coward if he didn’t and that he could only be in our gang if he showed us that he had courage…we could persuade him to do these things because he was easily misled.

People with mental retardation may also engage in criminal behavior because of their characteristically poor impulse control, difficulty with long-term thinking, and difficulty handling stressful and emotionally fraught situations. They may not be able to predict the consequences of their acts or resist a strong emotional response. The homicides committed by the people with mental retardation acting alone are almost without exception unplanned, spur of the moment acts of violence in the context of panic, fear, or anger, often committed when another crime, such as a robbery, went wrong. For example, William Smith, I.Q. 65, tried to take money from “old Dan,” a friendly elderly storekeeper he had known all his life. When Dan resisted, smith panicked and lashed out, killing him.

Low intellectual skills and limited planning capacities mean that people who have mental retardation are more likely than people of normal intelligence to get caught if they commit crimes. As a result, they make goof “fall guys” for more sophisticated criminals. A suspect with mental retardation is also less likely to know how to avoid incriminating himself, hire a lawyer and negotiate a plea.

Frequently Asked Questions about Mental Retardation

Where can I find detailed information about the 2002 AAMR definition of mental retardation?

The released 10^th edition of Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification, and systems of supports discusses the 2002 AAMR definition and classification system in great detail. It presents the latest thinking about the mental retardation and includes important tools and strategies to determine if an individual has mental retardation along with detailed information about developing a personal plan of individualized supports. It is an available from AAMR through the Website.

What is the official AAMR definition of mental retardation?

Mental retardation Is a disability characterized by significant limitations both in intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior as expressed in conceptual, social, and practical adaptive skills. This disability originates before the age of 18.

A complete and accurate understanding of mental retardation involves realizing that mental retardation refers to a particular state of functioning that begins in childhood, has many dimensions, and is affected positively by individualized supports. As a model of functioning, it includes the contexts and environment within which the person functions and interacts and requires a multidimensional and ecological approach that reflects the interaction of the individual with the environment, and the outcomes of that interaction with regards to independence, relationship, societal contributions, participation in school and community, and personal well being.

What factors must be considered when determining if a person has mental retardation and developing an individualized support plan?

When using the AAMR definition, classification and systems of supports professionals

And other team members must:

1. Evaluate limitations in present functioning within the context of the individual’s age peers and culture;                                                                                                                       
2. Take into account the individual’s cultural and linguistic difference as well as communication, sensory, motor, and behavioral factors;                                                        
3. Recognize that within an individual limitations often coexist with strengths;                                                                                                                             
4. Describes limitations so that an individualized plan of needed supports can be developed; and                                                                                                                 
5. Provide appropriate personalized supports to improve the functioning of a person with mental retardation.

Has AAMR always had the same definition of mental retardation?

No. AAMR has updated the definition of mental retardation ten times since 1908. Changes in definition have occurred when there is new information, or there are changes in clinical practice or breakthroughs in scientific research. The 10^th edition of Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification and systems of supports contains a comprehensive update to the landmark 1992 system and provides important new information, tools and strategies for the field and for anyone concerned about people with Mental Retardation.

What is a disability?

A disability refers to personal limitations that represent a substantial disadvantage when attempting to function in society. A disability should be considered within the context of the environment, personal factors, and the need for individualized supports.

What are the causes of Mental Retardation?

The causes of mental retardation can be divided into biomedical, social behavioral and educational risk factors that interact during the life of an individual and /or across generations from parent to child. Biomedical factors are related to biologic process, such as genetic disorders or nutrition. Social factors are related to social and family interaction, such as child stimulation and adult responsiveness. Behavioral factors are related to harmful behaviors, such as mental substance abuse. And educational factors are related to harmful behaviors, such as family and educational supports that promote mental development and increases in adaptive skills. Also, factors present during one generation can influence the outcomes of the next generation. By understanding inter-generational causes appropriate supports can be used to prevent and reverse the effects of risk factors.

What is the AAMR Mission?

Founded in 1876, AAMR is the world’s oldest and largest interdisciplinary organization of professionals concerned about mental retardation. With headquarters in Washington, DC, AAMR has a constituency of more than 50,000 people and an active core membership of 7,500 in United States and in 55 other countries. The mission of AAMR is to promote progressive policies, sound research, effective practices, and universal rights for people with intellectual disabilities.